Registered Users



Consultants

Consultants

Please note that only registered users will be able to access the information contained within this section of the site.
Further details regarding the registration process shall be provided shortly.
Please come back soon for further updates.
Section text to follow soon.

Having the best and safest surgery in the NHS for children's heart conditions has to strike a balance between services that are close to home and services with enough specialist expertise to allow the highest standards of care.

Heart surgery for children is complex and becoming even more sophisticated. The NHS is looking at the best way to ensure that:

• Each surgical team does an adequate number of operations a year to achieve the best results

• Units have enough volume of work to train the next generation of surgeons

• There are enough surgeons for proper team working and to provide specialist out of hours care.

This document makes it clear that to sustain current levels of care and to do even better in the future, surgeons treating heart conditions in babies and children must be concentrated in fewer, bigger centres.

As a parent of a child with a heart condition it is vital that your views are heard as this decision will affect not just your family but also many other families going through a similar experience in years to come. As surgeons, our job is to provide the very best quality surgery we can.

The key decision is whether you accept the case for having to travel further to get a better service. We do not underestimate the difficulties you will have to face.

John Black
President, The Royal College of Surgeons of England


 

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges Statement

Our understanding of Supporting Professional Activities (SPAs) is that they reflect time spent undertaking teaching, training, education, CPD (including reading journals), audit, appraisal, research, clinical management, clinical governance, service development etc.; activities that are essential to the long-term maintenance of the quality of the service but do not represent direct patient care.

SPAs should not include major additional NHS responsibilities such as those of a Medical Director or Clinical Director, training programme director or Postgraduate Dean. SPAs should not include agreed external duties such as acting as an examiner, peer assessor, College / DH / GMC work etc.

Read more...

Foreward

Doctors are among the most trusted of all professionals. However, we practise in a less deferential age where patients are more questioning and where the knowledge of what medicine can do increases expectations and we have to ensure that the trust in doctors continues to be justified.

Read more...

Dec 2008, Steve Livesey This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Liam Donaldson's report "Good Doctors, Safer Patients" (2006) and the subsequent white paper "Trust, Assurance and Safety" (2007) confirmed a system of revalidation for doctors which would include an element of specialist recertification for those doctors on the specialist register. The recent pamphlet, "Medical Revalidation - Principles & Next Steps" (July 2008) has set out the principles of revalidation. This will happen on a five-yearly cycle. A doctor will be revalidated when he has been relicensed – this will be the end result of successful appraisal, and recertified – this will signify he/she has met the standards set by his/her specialty association. For recertification, a doctor will need to present evidence about their practice from several sources. This will include:

-evidence of continuing professional development -meeting standards laid down by the relevant Specialty Association and agreed by the Royal Colleges and GMC

-evidence that surgical outcomes are above a minimum standard agreed by the Specialty Association

Read more...

Analysis of Specialty Association Returns - Outcomes

Introduction

This document shows the proposals from SCTS to the Pan-Specialty Recertification Board. It represents the outcome measures for each of the three disciplines (Adult Cardiac, Thoracic, Congenital Cardiac) which may be used to assess surgical outcomes.

To review the complete consultation document please see below.

Analysis of Specialty Association Returns - Outcomes

 Click Here

Patrick Magee, Chairman, SCTS Clinical Excellence Awards Committee, 2009. The Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards (ACCEA) website states that Clinical Excellence Awards are given to recognise and reward the exceptional contribution of NHS Consultants, over and above that normally expected in the job, to the value and goals of the NHS and patient care. ACCEA operates the arrangements which replaced discretionary points and distinction awards with a single more graduated scheme comprising both local and national elements.

National Awards

The Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery is a recognised nominating body for national awards, and as such can nominate directly through ACCEA and SACDA (the equivalent in Scotland) as well as via the Royal Colleges. The Society's Committee for Clinical Excellence Awards is made up of:
• Graham Cooper
• Leslie Hamilton
• Richard Page
• John Pepper
• Patrick Magee (Chairman)
• Lady Irvine (the wife of Sir Donald Irvineand herself much experienced in NHS matters, as a Lay Member)
We plan to recruit an extra member from those Consultants who does not hold a national award, and we now are inviting anyone interested in taking on this role to contact either Graham Cooper or myself. The Society invites those who are eligible and are applying for a national award, and would like SCTS support, to submit an application. All the applications are scored by the Committee using the following system, up to a maximum of 21 points:

Read more...

The Executive believe that is necessary to have a robust, methodical and transparent process for managing the possibility that a surgeon's outcomes may cross an alert or an alarm line. Over the past few months we have been developing our thinking about this. Explaining Divergence is the process that we will be following. There are three key principles; the process must not lead to patients who are at high risk being denied surgery, the response must be reasonable and proportionate and that the crossing of a line is a stimulus to interrogate the data and not the surgeon. In addition SCTS has a duty to support any member who becomes involved in the process, this mechanism is also explained within the document. Explaining Divergence has been debated at The Board of Representatives in November 2008, Annual Business meeting in March 2009 and the policy was approved by The Executive on 5th June 2009.

Read more...

This page is dedicated to professional issues which cannot be categorized under the other topics in this section. It will include information regarding the DoH approach to Cardiothoracic matters. Also, it will include information from individual Trusts on matters that may affect the speciality or the NHS employees as a whole.
By Mike Broad - 19th January 2010. A major review of the regulation of doctors' education and training has taken the first steps in controlling the quality of European doctors entering the UK. The review's draft report makes 27 recommendations to the GMC a head of it taking over the regulation of the whole of medical education in April, following its merger with the Post Graduate Medical Education and Training Board. The report challenges the automatic inclusion of senior European doctors, with supposedly equivalent qualifications, on the specialist register. Member states of the European Economic Area are required by law to recognise the qualifications of each others' doctors. It means that the GMC cannot carry out additional assessments of knowledge and skill. 'This clearly limits the effectiveness of the registers and the ability of the GMC to protect patients,' the report says.

Read more...

Useful contacts of legal firms that run medico-legal courses:

Read more...

1. Mr A was born on 5/3/1936, and died on 17/7/2002, aged 66 yrs, two days following discharge from hospital, having undergone open heart surgery.

2. In September 1977 he was found to have mitral valve prolapse. However he was asymptomatic.

3. In March 2000, he was referred to Dr X (Consultant Cardiologist), requesting a TOE, as Mr A had become increasingly short of breath over the previous 4-5 yrs.

4. A TTE showed moderate to severe mitral regurgitation.

5. On 27/9/2000, Mr A was referred to Mr Y (Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon), for consideration of mitral valve surgery.

 

Read more...

As a point of reference, procedural codes for the main CT operations are provided. Individual insurance companies should be consulted for more complex procedures or those that do not appear on the list. Re-imbursement values also vary and are updated annually by each company.

There are numerous companies providing health insurance cover acting either as intermediaries or as the primary provider; contact details may be obtained via:

Private Healthcare UK

The process for job plan review in England and Wales and approval is part of the remit of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. In the majority of disciplines this had been a one-stop process with the Regional Surgical Representative (RSA) of the Royal College acting as the referee for the job descriptions and when appropriate sanctioning the jobs approval prior to the post being advertised.

Read more...

An interim statement from the Executive of the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland.

The keeping of "diary cards will be very important and all members are encouraged to do so as it will document the extent of work undertaken. This is the agreed process and detailed diaries will be difficult to refute in the job planning process.

Read more...

Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, Feb 2010. Our understanding of Supporting Professional Activities (SPAs) is that they reflect time spent undertaking teaching, training, education, CPD (including reading journals), audit, appraisal, research, clinical management, clinical governance, service development etc.; activities that are essential to the long-term maintenance of the quality of the service but do not represent direct patient care. SPAs should not include major additional NHS responsibilities such as those of a Medical Director or Clinical Director, training programme director or Postgraduate Dean. SPAs should not include agreed external duties such as acting as an examiner, peer assessor, College / DH / GMC work etc. This matter lies partly in the realm of negotiations of terms and conditions of service, which is a responsibility of the BMA and the HCSA and is outside the remit of the Medical Royal Colleges; but it also impacts directly on maintaining and improving the quality of the service, which is a direct and legitimate interest of Medical Royal Colleges. Many Royal Colleges have managed this problem simply by referring to the recommendations made in the Consultant Contract as negotiated between the BMA and the Department of Health. This recommends 2.5 SPAs in a 10 Programmed Activity (PA) contract, with a higher proportion of SPAs for those working part time.

Read more...

We have an adversarial legal system in which the Claimant and the Defendant put forward their respective arguments and the Court decides in favour of one or the other. The system depends on "Experts" to advise the Court on standards of care – to be successful in a claim for clinical negligence, the claimant has to first establish the standard of care which should have been given (Duty of Care) and then show that that standard was not achieved (breach of Duty of Care). The patient then has to show that this breach of Duty of Care caused the harm which they suffered. Thus a Surgeon has to advise on these issues. There is no set definition of an Expert but it is essentially one who has the knowledge to advise the Court on the standards of care at the time of the event.

Read more...

The incidence of cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery is around 0.7% to 2.9% and has reduced in recent years. The most remarkable statistic regarding these patients is the relatively good outcome with 17%-79% of patients suffering a cardiac arrest surviving to hospital discharge, a far higher proportion than can be hoped for when cardiac arrest occurs in other settings. The reason for this superior survival is the high incidence of reversible causes for the arrest. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) accounts for the rhythm in 25-50% of cases and, in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, this is immediately identified and treated. In addition, tamponade and major bleeding account for many arrests and both conditions may be quickly relieved by prompt resuscitation and emergency resternotomy where appropriate. 

Read more...

Dear Member

Attached are the SCTS Guidelines for placing emergency referrals. Following the debate at the March 2005 SCTS Annual Business Meeting, the SCTS Executive was asked to issue advice on situations when a cardiothoracic surgical unit is unable to accept an emergency referral.These were originally introduced in 2005. Following discussion at the Executive and Board of Representatives we are re-circulating them. They are also available in the Guidelines section of the SCTS website. Please consider forwarding them to your referring hospitals.

Best Wishes.

H.M. Coroner for Leicester City and South Leicestershire
Mrs Catherine E. Mason LL.B; BSc HONS; RGN
The Town Hall
Town Hall Square
Leicester LEl 9BG
TeI: (0116) 225 2534 /2535
Fax: (0116) 225 2537

All correspondence to be addressed to:

H.M. Coroner
Cardi -Solutions
32 Claro Court Business Centre
Claro Road, Harrogate
North Yorkshire HG14BA

22nd January 2010

Dear Sirs,

Re: Inquest touching the death of Peggy Anne Thomas

I am reporting this matter to you in accordance with Rule 43 of the Coroners Rules 1984 (as recently amended) following my inquest into the death of Mrs Peggy Thomas on the 22nd January 2010. You may know that Rule 43 allows a Coroner to make a report of the case to an appropriate authority where J he/she is of the opinion that action is necessary to prevent or reduce the risk of other fatalities in the future. By Rule 43(a) the person in receipt of a report must give the Coroner a written reply within 56 days containing details of any action to be taken in response or an explanation as to why no action is proposed. The Coroner is required to provide the Lord Chancellor and those involved at the inquest with a copy of the report and any responses. The Lord Chancellor may publish a report and responses if he sees fit but this is more likely to be in the form of a short summary for public safety purposes.

Read more...

Senior doctors have moved swiftly to defend Clinical Excellence Awards (CEAs) for NHS consultants following a renewed attack on the system. Scottish health secretary Nicola Sturgeon has called for a freeze on CEAs for all consultants and for a UK-wide overhaul of the system. In a letter to Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the health secretaries in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Sturgeon argues for the existing scheme to be replaced with a "fairer" system that recognises the contributions of a range of practitioners. She has also written to Ron Amy, chairman of the Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body, calling for a freeze both on both the cash value of the 2010-11 CEAs and the number awarded. She said CEAs are outdated and should be reformed on a four-country basis to avoid undermining the competitiveness of any one country when recruiting consultants. "We are in a difficult financial climate at present and the pay of already highly-paid NHS staff should not be increased," declares Sturgeon.

Read more...

More Articles...

Page 1 of 2

Start
Prev
1